President Donald Trump on Friday defended his Department of Justice‘s issuance of subpoenas to New York Times reporters, as it was revealed that Google also received a subpoena in the same criminal investigation of the leak of information about the president’s new Air Force One plane.

Trump’s comments on the subpoenas came a day after the DOJ told a New York federal judge it was withdrawing those subpoenas for grand jury testimony by Times reporters and their phone records. The DOJ is investigating the leak of concerns about the security measures on the president’s Qatari-donated plane, which the Times wrote about earlier in July.

Judge Arun Subramanian had warned prosecutors on Thursday that if they did not voluntarily withdraw the subpoenas, he would quash them.

“We’re not after journalists,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Friday. “We’re after leakers. We’re after people that are cowards, people that are unpatriotic, people that are treasonous in many cases.”

“And the way you find them is through journalists,” the president said.

“That person should be found, and the way you find them is to tell the journalist, if it’s something having to do with national security, you tell the journalist: ‘Who is it?’ ” Trump said.

“And we have a long way to go with that case,” he added.

At around the same time that Trump was talking, a letter that lawyers for Google sent Friday to Subramanian was unsealed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan on the order of the judge.

The letter revealed that Google on July 16 was issued a subpoena from a grand jury at the behest of the DOJ seeking “subscriber information associated with a phone number.”

The subpoena was sent to Google a day after lawyers for the Times moved to quash subpoenas issued to their reporters.

Google also received on July 16 an order not to disclose to the phone number subscriber that fact that it had received a subpoena for their information.

In their letter on Friday, Google’s lawyers asked Subramanian to vacate the non-disclosure order, which had been signed by a magistrate judge, arguing that the order violates the First Amendment of the Constitution, which established the right to free speech.

“The government has admitted that, at the time of its application for the NDO, it ‘inadvertently included language that the investigation was “not public” when the fact of the investigation was public,’ ” the letter said.

Subramanian granted the request to vacate the NDO, a court filing shows.