E. Jean Carroll walks outside Manhattan Federal Court, for the second civil trial after she accused former U.S. President Donald Trump of raping her decades ago, in New York City, U.S., January 25, 2024.
Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters
President Donald Trump on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court to overturn a civil court verdict that ordered him to pay the writer E. Jean Carroll $83.3 million for defaming her while denying her claim that he sexually assaulted her in a New York department store dressing room in the mid-1990s.
“This is the first case in our Nation’s history in which a court has imposed damages liability on a President for his conduct in office,” the petition to the Supreme Court by Trump’s lawyers says.
The attorneys claim that Trump has immunity from the defamation claim in the case because he made the comments about Carroll in 2019, when he was president.
The petition comes a month after the Supreme Court rejected Trump’s request that it hear his appeal of a $5 million verdict in favor of Carroll in a separate, but related, civil case. Carroll two weeks ago received that money, in addition to more than $600,000 in interest, from a court fund where Trump had deposited funds to secure the verdict.
In that case, a Manhattan federal court jury in May 2023 found that Trump was liable for having sexually abused Carroll in the dressing room of the Bergdorf Goodman department store in the 1990s, and for defaming her in late 2022 when he made statements denying her allegations.
In the second case, which is the subject of the new petition to the Supreme Court, another Manhattan federal court jury in January 2024 found Trump civilly liable for defaming Carroll in 2019 when she went public with her claim that Trump had raped her in the dressing room.
That verdict, with its $83.3. million award, was upheld by the 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.
Trump’s lawyers, in their petition on Tuesday, said the 2nd Circuit “wrongly held that President Trump had somehow forfeited the defense of Presidential immunity solely because his first responsive pleading did not invoke Presidential immunity by name, even though President Trump repeatedly invoked that immunity, including in his answer to the amended complaint and his motion for summary judgment.”
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
